Recommendations and also limitations, gaps identified in the existing methodologies and a list of open issues are included. 2) Modelling equipment of safety related SSC, 3) HRA, 4) Emergency response, 5) Multi-unit issues. The following issues are addressed: 1) Hazard assessment methodologies, including issues related to hazard combinations. In appendixes additional material is presented with the examples of practical approaches to aircraft crash and man-made hazard. Classification and criteria to properly assess hazard combinations as well as examples and methods for assessment of these combinations are included in this guidance. The sources and quality of hazard data, the elements of hazard assessment methodologies and relevant examples are discussed. The initial part of guidance (WP21 part) reflects current practices to assess the frequencies for each type of hazards or combination of hazards (including correlated hazards) as initiating event for PSAs. Guidance developed refers to existing guidance whenever possible. This guidance is focusing on man-made hazards, namely: external fires and explosions, and accidental aircraft crash hazards. The objective of WP22 is to provide the solutions for purposes of different parts of man-made hazards Level 1 PSA fulfilment. The general objective of WP21 is to provide guidance on all of the individual hazards selected at the first ASAMPSA-E End Users Workshop (May 2014, Uppsala, Sweden). This report is a joint deliverable of work package 21 (WP21) and work package 22 (WP22). The goal of this report is to provide guidance on practices to model man-made hazards (mainly external fires and explosions) and accidental aircraft crash hazards and implement them in extended Level 1 PSA. International Nuclear Information System (INIS) Man-made hazards and Accidental Aircraft Crash hazards modelling and implementation in extended PSA In other words, for the faithful pointers, if a measurement situation is formally ideal then it is operationally ideal and vice versa. In this paper, we derive a class of pointer states, that we call faithful pointers, for which the degree of formal (non)idealness is equal to the operational (non)idealness. In fact, for the commonly referred Gaussian wavefunction, it is possible to obtain a measurement situation which is formally ideal but fully nonideal operationally. We point out that mutual orthogonality (formal idealness) does not necessarily imply the real space distinguishability (operational idealness), but converse is true. It is implicitly assumed that mutual orthogonality ensures the support between the post-interaction pointer distributions to be disjoint. However, for experimentally verifying the observable probabilities, the real space distinction between the pointer distributions corresponding to post-interaction pointer states play crucial role. In the context of von Neumann projective measurement scenario for a qubit system, it is widely believed that the mutual orthogonality between the post-interaction pointer states is the sufficient condition for achieving the ideal measurement situation. In this paper we quantitatively determine if wearable laser pointers are viable. This kind of technology augments the range of human perception and actuation. Wearable camera and display technology allow remote collaborators to guide activities performed by human agents located elsewhere. Jalaliniya, Shahram Pederson, Thomas Houben, Steven Wearable Laser Pointer Versus Head-mounted Display for Tele- guidance Applications?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |